Recently, reports about US President Barrack Obama’s disapproval of the outsourcing of tasks produced stirred the business community. Companies in the United States have been sending out jobs to other countries to save operational cost. Some business experts think this slowly kills the domestic business situation through lowered national employment and lessened internal business activity. While so many big companies in North America have transferred a lot of jobs to places like China, India and Philippines, many people are thinking this could backfire unto the American economy.
Outsourcing has been the answer to profound global economic problems and it seems unclear whether it is, in general, an economically constructive strategy. The opinion generally varies from expert to expert and different people have their own biases when stating their views regarding the matter at hand. Upon a quick look, it seems as though outsourcing shifts industrial activity – at least some of it. For instance, jobs that were once available in UK and US are now farmed out to low-charging countries in Asia.
Now, this transition cannot be blamed to the presence of outsourcing companies in the east. In fact, it is logical to believe that this situation can be explained through cause-effect relationship. The establishment of business process outsourcing companies is a reaction to the increasing demand from the western world. These companies cannot be clumsily viewed as opportunistic. This is a two way process of giving and taking. Somebody needs something; somebody produces. In which case both parties benefit from the arrangement.
As in the terms of global economic standing, some experts are lashing against the outsourcing process. Thinking of outsourcing as taking advantage from western countries is like thinking that a sweets shop is taking advantage of the kids who buy sweets from it. BPO teams work to aid companies cut back on cost by delivering services that are otherwise much more expensive when procured domestically.
The disadvantage is unclear, just as the complaints about unemployment rate seems vague. Data shows that there is some increase in employment rate in October 2009. This change is not uniform though. While states like Michigan and Texas saw a positive employment rate change, states like New York and Florida saw some negative change. Nonetheless, such changes cannot be readily and directly linked to outsourcing. Many people are led to thinking that BPO companies stole jobs from where they were once available. This information misleads. Anyone can looking closely at the current scene would capture the reality that this trend has generated new opportunities both to countries that farm out jobs and to countries that establish BPO firms.
Outsourcing stays as long as there is a need for it. In the foreseeable future, it seems to be a relevant economic movement. Business process outsourcing companies have proven their value over a short span of time. This fact is undeniable.



No Replies
Feel free to leave a reply using the form below!
Leave a Reply